My Name is Cordelia Reagan

Ask me anything you want!   Submit Something! Do it, you won't   This is my blog.

twitter.com/cordeliareagan:

    lacigreen:

topanga knows what’s up

    lacigreen:

    topanga knows what’s up

    (Source: jennabtc)

    — 8 hours ago with 2024 notes
    "

    When neo-soul singer Erykah Badu announced her third pregnancy in 2008, some fans attacked her for having children outside of marriage with more than one father. One online commenter labeled the singer, known for rocking a mega ’fro, ‘trash with great hair.’ A Zimbio.com article that referred to Badu’s ‘growing list of baby daddies’ featured a ‘Knocked Up Again’ headline. A blog article wondered baldly if the singer was ‘a ho.’ She was derided as a poor example of black womanhood. The storm got so heavy that Badu bit back in a lengthy and poetically unapologetic online post about her family that ended with an entreaty to ‘Kiss my placenta.’


    Three years later, when Beyoncé announced she was expecting, she was publicly applauded for doing pregnancy ‘the right way,’ and celebrated for being a model of black womanhood. Even Diddy’s 18-year-old son, Justin Combs, weighed in on Bey’s proper use of her uterus. Combs tweeted: ‘Beyoncé dated, married, THEN got pregnant…young ladies take notes.’ (No word on whether Combs’s dad, who has never married but has five children, is also taking notes.)

    "
    — 10 hours ago with 532 notes
    [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

    crookedvision:

    Beulah - Popular Mechanics for Lovers

    (via punkwiththestutter)

    — 12 hours ago with 18 notes
    discoverynews:

Happy Birthday, Walt Whitman!

Love the earth and sun and the animals,despise riches, give alms to everyone that asks,stand up for the stupid and crazy,devote your income and labor to others,hate tyrants, argue not concerning God,have patience and indulgence toward the people,take off your hat to nothing known or unknown,or to any man or number of men,go freely with powerful uneducated persons,and with the young, and with the mothers or families,re-examine all you have been told in school or church or in any book,and dismiss whatever insults your own soul;and your very flesh shall be a great poem….  ~ Walt Whitman ~  (from the Preface to Leaves of Grass, 1855 edition)

    discoverynews:

    Happy Birthday, Walt Whitman!

    Love the earth and sun and the animals,
    despise riches, give alms to everyone that asks,
    stand up for the stupid and crazy,
    devote your income and labor to others,
    hate tyrants, argue not concerning God,
    have patience and indulgence toward the people,
    take off your hat to nothing known or unknown,
    or to any man or number of men,
    go freely with powerful uneducated persons,
    and with the young, and with the mothers or families,
    re-examine all you have been told in school or church or in any book,
    and dismiss whatever insults your own soul;
    and your very flesh shall be a great poem….
     
     
    ~ Walt Whitman ~
     
     (from the Preface to Leaves of Grass, 1855 edition)

    (via theweekmagazine)

    — 12 hours ago with 571 notes
    theweekmagazine:

On Thursday, a three-judge panel for the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) — which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman —  is unconstitutional. This marks the first time that a federal appeals court has struck down the law, making it likely that the constitutionality of DOMA will eventually be weighed by the Supreme Court.
Here, five takeaways from the landmark decision:
1. The court didn’t declare gay marriage a constitutional rightThe court focused on a provision in DOMA that denies federal benefits — such as the ability to file taxes jointly or receive Social Security survivor benefits — to married same-sex couples. The court said that part of the law is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right of states to craft their own marriage laws by discriminating against same-sex couples in states where gay marriage is legal. The court stopped short of ruling that gay couples have a constitutional right to marry, nor did it force all states to recognize the legality of same-sex marriages performed in states where it is legal.
2. Two GOP-appointed judges joined the ruling The three-judge panel, which included two Republican-appointed judges, was unanimous in its decision, strengthening the nonpartisan case against DOMA. Judge Michael Boudin was appointed by George H.W. Bush, while Judge Juan Torruella was appointed by Ronald Reagan. The third judge, Sandra Lynch, was appointed by Bill Clinton, who signed DOMA into law in 1996.
3. The Obama administration did not defend the law While it’s customary for the Justice Department to defend challenges to all federal laws, the Obama administration announced last year that it would not defend DOMA in court, deeming it unconstitutional. Obama only recently became the first sitting president to endorse gay marriage, though he says the definition of marriage should be left to the states. 
4. DOMA opponents are claiming a huge victory “Today’s landmark ruling makes clear once again that DOMA is a discriminatory law for which there is no justification,” says Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley. “It is unconstitutional for the federal government to create a system of first- and second-class marriages.” 
5. But the ruling will not go into effect… yet The Boston court said its ruling would have no effect on DOMA in practice, affirming that “only the Supreme Court can finally decide this unique case.” The latest ruling followed a similar decision by a district judge in California last week, “a further chipping away at the law that is almost certain to see it land before the Supreme Court within the next year or so,” says Chris McGreal at Britain’s The Guardian.

    theweekmagazine:

    On Thursday, a three-judge panel for the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) — which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman —  is unconstitutional. This marks the first time that a federal appeals court has struck down the law, making it likely that the constitutionality of DOMA will eventually be weighed by the Supreme Court.

    Here, five takeaways from the landmark decision:

    1. The court didn’t declare gay marriage a constitutional right
    The court focused on a provision in DOMA that denies federal benefits — such as the ability to file taxes jointly or receive Social Security survivor benefits — to married same-sex couples. The court said that part of the law is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right of states to craft their own marriage laws by discriminating against same-sex couples in states where gay marriage is legal. The court stopped short of ruling that gay couples have a constitutional right to marry, nor did it force all states to recognize the legality of same-sex marriages performed in states where it is legal.

    2. Two GOP-appointed judges joined the ruling 
    The three-judge panel, which included two Republican-appointed judges, was unanimous in its decision, strengthening the nonpartisan case against DOMA. Judge Michael Boudin was appointed by George H.W. Bush, while Judge Juan Torruella was appointed by Ronald Reagan. The third judge, Sandra Lynch, was appointed by Bill Clinton, who signed DOMA into law in 1996.

    3. The Obama administration did not defend the law 
    While it’s customary for the Justice Department to defend challenges to all federal laws, the Obama administration announced last year that it would not defend DOMA in court, deeming it unconstitutional. Obama only recently became the first sitting president to endorse gay marriage, though he says the definition of marriage should be left to the states. 

    4. DOMA opponents are claiming a huge victory 
    “Today’s landmark ruling makes clear once again that DOMA is a discriminatory law for which there is no justification,” says Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley. “It is unconstitutional for the federal government to create a system of first- and second-class marriages.” 

    5. But the ruling will not go into effect… yet 
    The Boston court said its ruling would have no effect on DOMA in practice, affirming that “only the Supreme Court can finally decide this unique case.” The latest ruling followed a similar decision by a district judge in California last week, “a further chipping away at the law that is almost certain to see it land before the Supreme Court within the next year or so,” says Chris McGreal at Britain’s The Guardian.

    (Source: theweek.com)

    — 12 hours ago with 57 notes
    [Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

    metalgearsalad:

    Bohemian Like You//The Dandy Warhols

    (via punkwiththestutter)

    — 12 hours ago with 86 notes
    political-linguaphile:

Things no one tells you:
Having sex doesn’t make you a whore.
Not having sex doesn’t make you a saint.
You don’t have to have kids if you don’t want to.
You are the only person who has rights over your body.
You are no one to judge others.
“Femininity” is not anti-feminist. 
Verbal harassment is not flattery. 
If something makes you uncomfortable, you don’t have to endure it.
You don’t owe anything to anyone. 

    political-linguaphile:

    Things no one tells you:

    • Having sex doesn’t make you a whore.
    • Not having sex doesn’t make you a saint.
    • You don’t have to have kids if you don’t want to.
    • You are the only person who has rights over your body.
    • You are no one to judge others.
    • “Femininity” is not anti-feminist. 
    • Verbal harassment is not flattery. 
    • If something makes you uncomfortable, you don’t have to endure it.
    • You don’t owe anything to anyone. 

    (Source: viva-la-vulva-zine, via asgardian-feminist)

    — 1 day ago with 6032 notes

    think-progress:

    Income inequality, as seen from outer space. More trees = wealthier neighborhood.

    Featured here: Chicago, Boston, Oakland

    (via theweekmagazine)

    — 1 day ago with 215 notes